Weekly Immigration Wire: Legalize the Undocumented, Help Fix the Economy

THE DIALOGUE ON IMMIGRATION has, historically, been contentious and cyclical. There are times when hysteria peaks, and rational thought struggles to enter the national dialogue. And then, there are moments the truth breaches the surface and shines brightly. This week is one of those moments.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

[For those new to UMX, The Weekly Immigration Wire is my weekly (paid) article I write for The Media Consortium. It is a column that runs on a few other sites (see end of post)

WIW flagsun

by Nezua, TMC MediaWire Blogger

The dialogue on immigration has, historically, been contentious and cyclical. There are times when hysteria peaks, and rational thought struggles to enter the national dialogue. There are also moments of truth. This week, independent media debunked many myths about the undocumented and made the case for the positive impact of immigrants in the US, including the positive effect of legalizing the undocumented on the economy and how citizens are holding elected representatives accountable for votes against pro-immigrant measures.

Wendy Norris, writing for the Colorado Independent, held the New York Times to task for using questionable sources in an article about President Obama’s push for immigration reform. Norris exposes the background of quoted anti-immigration groups like NumbersUSA, CIS, and FAIR, who have ties to white supremacy groups and eugenics promoters and calls the New York Times out for quoting organizations “repeatedly discredited as hate groups.” When hate groups are quoted as legitimate sources, society suffers from the misrepresentation.

Also in New America Media, Jacqueline Esposito and Jumana Musa explore the kinds of “enforcement” that groups like NumbersUSA and FAIR claim is the most important part of Immigration Reform. Esposito and Musa cite the case of Guido Newbrough, a detainee who made multiple requests for medical attention; there was a treatable bacterial infection in his heart. Newbrough was locked in an isolation cell and died of the ailment.

“As the country moves forward on comprehensive immigration reform,” they write, “We must uphold American values by ensuring that all people, no matter where they come from, are afforded fundamental rights, including the right to a fair day in court before being deprived of liberty and the right to be free from inhumane conditions of confinement. As a nation, we cannot stand for anything less.”

The San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee (DCCC) would no doubt agree with that sentiment, as Beatriz Herrera reports for Wiretap. Apparently, the DCCC voted 20-1 against San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom to preserve Sanctuary ordinances for juvenile offenders. These ordinances ensure that offenders have a chance to prove their innocence instead of facing immediate deportation.

During the 2008 election season, voices calling for reason in the immigration debate were often drowned out by the near-hysteria that certain elements of the Right called forth. Another encouraging sign that we are, perhaps, at a new juncture: Today, even democratic state senators are being held accountable. Colorado Sen. Morgan Carroll (D-Aurora) was recently forced to defend her vote against SB 170, the tuition bill was one that would provide in-state tuition equity for undocumented Colorado high school graduates, on the air.

According to the Colorado Independent, Sen. Morgan appeared on progressive talk radio host Mario Solis-Marich’s show on April 10—after “a week of being beat up in the press and on the blogs” for her opposition to the bill.

In Public News Service, Doug Ramsey has news about a report which focuses on the benefits of legalizing currently undocumented workers. Compiled by the nonpartisan Immigration Policy Center, the report breaks down how legalizing the undocumented community would increase the amount of income that the immigrant community brings into the economy. Rather than immigrants costing us, “legalization would boost tax collections at all levels of government by $66 billion over the next few years.”

Public News Service also explores the economic benefits to bringing the underground economy above ground. According to David Kallick, an economist with the Fiscal Institute, billions of dollars are simply “lining the pockets of employers who hire folks in the underground economy and avoid contributing to payroll and other taxes.”

And OneWorld US reports that Hispanic rights advocates are eager to hear the president’s plan for immigration reform and note that very reform is key to economic recovery. Janet Murguía, President and CEO of the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the US notes that “the path to a strong economic recovery includes strategies that lift wages, increase revenue, and create a level playing field—and immigration is a crucial element of that equation.”

Even the American Prospect‘s Ezra Klein is writing about immigration in a more proactive light. Just last week, Klein wrote Why Immigration Reform Won’t Happen. He is now making The Political Case for Immigration Reform.

So maybe we’re figuring it out as we go. The costs of letting parts of our country fail and fall away are more than economic, they are moral and profound. We have time to act, but opposition voices are gathering in number. There are many anti-immigrant myths, and many oppose a truly progressive stance on immigration. But we have the will for the struggle and the payoff will come not only in a healthier economy, but in a sounder national soul.

Are you ready? Let’s go.

———————————————————

Also featured at The Sanctuary, Huffington Post,Talking Points Memo, Open Salon, DailyKos, MyDD, Open Left, FDL, Rabble, In These Times blog, and America’s Voice.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


  • Share


5 Comments

  1. T.L. Winslow says:

    Hey, check out my site, containing my new solution to the so-called U.S.-Mexican border problem. It can be solved so easily.

  2. nezua says:

    Well I appreciate a lot of what you are saying in there. And at least you are being terribly thoughtful about it all.

    There certainly are problems with the Mexican govt. Thing is, MX is…how shall I put it? After hundreds of years of fighting off conquest and occupation, well…the nation is a little bit not so happy about ideas like being “taken over.” So there is no way, short of war, that the US is going to “take over” the MX govt any more than it already has in secret by way of backdoor dealings with illegitimate “Presidents” who steal elections and then deliver on promises like upping the Drug War model of violence against the People.

    Solutions lie in the US being a responsible neighbor, instead of some pimp-like aggressor with a hand around the neck of madre méxico.

  3. T.L. Winslow says:

    Thanks for reading it. Maybe it’s time for you to be as thoughtful as I, ese? I’m not talking about a takeover, but a megamerge, which means the Estados Unidos is now 75 states, and everybody is a citizen and gets to participate in government, elect congresspeople to send to Washington, and change everything peacefully, including immigration policy from Bangladesh. Is the irony so thick you could choke on it, the same government that trained me to kill you want to protect, don’t be a poor sport, Frank, you coulda taken me out but you chose to save your ass, don’t cry about it now. Which makes me think about Dallas, did you do all you could, or did you make a choice too? :)

    Ciao,

    TLW

  4. nezua says:

    I don’t want to protect a government, but the People. In Mexico. The citizenry and denizens who have no urge to see the US encroach even more on their culture, stabbing at wounds with a well-intentioned, if that, fork.

    Peace.

  5. T.L. Winslow says:

    When all Mexican-Americans are U.S. citizens just like gringo-Americans are, their culture will have the best possible protection, insuring its future. There’s no way you can turn the calendar back and stop the world from shrinking, so why not at least try to make the most of it?

    Why did you say fork? Were you thinking of how Taco Bell ruined Mexican food by gringoizing it?
    Hey I think Mexican culture is cool, but I’m a gringo and hot peppers burn my insides out, so I’m glad for Taco Bell :) .

    Yes, you could give me a long list of gripes about what Uncle Sam has done to Mexicans, but gimme a break, we’re changing, who did we recently elect, another George Bush or Barack Obama? Who did you elect, Emperor Maximilian or Felipe Calderon? There must be a way to megamerge and allow friendly mass 2-way migration to equalize development and opportunities, it’s only a line drawn on a map, get me an eraser.

    Let’s at least agree that the people on both sides can be friends even if their governments suck, and let bygones be bygones and see if there’s any real support for megamerge. If there was, on the unapologetic Mexican side, would you back them? Look at the European Union. They did it, so what’s our excuse? Are we the New World or what?

    Ciao,

    TLW

Leave a Comment

Additional comments powered by BackType