McCain’s Newest Attack Ad – Obama’s Dark Past

A LEAK OF MCCAIN’S NEWEST ATTACK VIDEO shows us just how far the McCain Campaign is willing to go in their quest for the White House. I have to admit, though, this angle is pretty devastating and I’m not sure what Obama can do to counter it. It is, I think we can all admit, the Dark Elephant in the room.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

from here.

Related Posts with Thumbnails


  • Share


11 Comments

  1. Jose says:

    I find this ad disagreeable … simply because they’re definitely using a Black man’s voice for this ad, and frankly, he’d never use a Black man in his campaign to dis Barack … oh wait, spoke too soon:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EadM8_UyHBQ

    Whoops. This ad is accurate.

  2. Joanna says:

    Hah! I got all super serious over at my site about this stuff, but I need to sharp bite of wit to get me out of my funk.

  3. nezua says:

    yeah, i think we need both…to dig in and then to just laugh sometimes. this can be maddening stuff!

  4. carolita says:

    Isn’t that McSame comment a clip from the last debate? I think that’s what he was muttering as he wandered around the stage. I’m not sure whether he has lost interest or lost his mind, or both, but he still makes more sense than Pfalin on her best day.

    I think this ad is hilarious, but then, I am one of those despicable community organizers.

  5. cocoadelight says:

    Nezua,

    You really set me up! But, thanks for the delightful chuckle afterwards.

  6. “I’m John McCain and I just don’t care anymore”
    If only. Cracked me up anyway.

    The funniest thing is this ad would probably play well with his supporters.

  7. William says:

    I posted the ad to dailykos, and one of the people uploaded it to Youtube.

  8. EYES OF TEXAS says:

    Do you think a Republican who said this could be elected president?

    By Vincent Gioia

    In his speech July 2 in Colorado Springs, Denver, media darling Barack Obama said:

    “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

    What Obama meant:

    “…we need a ‘civilian national security force’ that would be as powerful, strong and well-funded as the half-trillion dollar Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force …”

    But as reported by Joseph Farah of WorldNet Daily Obama’s comments concerning a national police force are not included in published transcripts of his prepared remarks. Moreover, transcripts posted at both the Wall Street Journal and Denver Post do not have the critical passage and none of the major news media even mentioned Obama’s call for a national police force.

    The transcripts have all had the above paragraph censored. But on the YouTube video you can hear the above comment.

    The budget of the Defense Department is about $585 billion, over $200,000 per employee. The Heritage Foundation reports that spending on military personnel averages $70,000 per member, though it is not clear what that entails. If Obama is talking about funding his civilian national security corps at the same level as the military, he would need at least an additional $500 billion. That can buy a lot of clicking boots and Lugers and other wafen for his national Gestapo.

    Joseph Farah on WorldNet Daily wrote:

    “If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal. I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together? Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?”

    I think Obama said exactly what he meant although as a slip of the tongue because this part of his agenda is not something to be expressed prior to the election. Obama has a socialist, near communist agenda, of government control and redistribution of wealth. A national police force would be important in achieving Obama’s goals and could be used to stifle opposition. If you think this is just conspiratorial thinking, reflect back on the days before Hitler’s rise to power in Germany.

    I thought we already had the FBI, DEA, BATF, U.S. Marshals, TSA, postal inspectors, park rangers, Secret Service, state bureaus of investigation, state police, local police, sheriffs and constables, among others, to already handle domestic law enforcement; why do we need an additional national police force? The only reason would be to exercise authority the existing agencies do not have.

    In all his life Obama has never managed an organization larger than a Senate staff, or that of a law school publication. And, he’s never operated a for-profit business or been responsible for any profit center within one. Yet now too many Americans seem willing to entrust him with management of the largest business in the world; and with a national police force as well.

    All Obama’s experience prior to his 123 days in the U.S. Senate has been in community organizing. Among other things he worked with ACORN, the extremist community organization whose rap sheet include perpetration of numerous acts of violence, such as the destructive actions in Philadelphia where numerous buildings were burned to the ground. His other experience includes assisting in the Meals-on-Wheels programs in Illinois, training programs for Vietnamese Refugees, assembling congregations and a synagogue in a mid-sized Texas town to provide emergency assistance to low-income citizens, and being an expert witness at a Texas Senate hearing when legislation forming the state’s Commission on Human Rights was being drafted. Although some of these community action deeds may be commendable, on one level, they hardly constitute any sort of experience to justify his election to the country’s highest office, and any comparison to Senator John McCain’s experience and background is laughable.

    Putting Obama in charge of a national police force is akin to giving a paper hanger (Hitler’s previous profession) an armed force funded with billions of dollars (to be commensurate with the existing military) and the power to enforce an agenda that will change every fabric of American freedom.

    I do not trust Barack Obama in the least and this only adds to my mistrust. If it had been John McCain who had made this proposal, the press would have been all over it. Why does Obama get a pass from the media; because they want Obama elected president!

    Do you Obama supporters still want him to be president after knowing about this part of his agenda? If you buy into Obama’s call for “change”, is this the kind of change you want?

    Vincent Gioia is a retired patent attorney living in Palm Desert, California. His articles may be read at http://www.vincentgioia.com and he may be contacted at gioia@gte.net.

  9. Malicia says:

    Carolita…a comedian, can’t remember who, did a bit voicing what McCain was thinking when he was walking around during the 2nd debate. His thoughts were “where is precious, I want the precious, MUST HAVE THE PRECIOUS” :D a la Lord of the Rings.

    And “unapologetic for setting American homes on fire”…I about fell off of my chair.

  10. Malicia says:

    I am now dancing around the room to some P-funk, this ad gave me a good idea for some music to listen to :D

  11. sweetleaf says:

    thx for the intro (for me anyway) to illdoctrine plus…”anti matter coolness” for certain.

Leave a Comment

Additional comments powered by BackType